Grice for graphics: pragmatic implicature in network diagrams
نویسنده
چکیده
Petre and Green [1992] observe intriguing phenomena which occur when real designers use complex graphical representations. They also offer a promising account for these phenomena. This paper explores an alternative account, which relies on the notion of graphical implicature. Whether or not the current account is useful has broader significance, because if it is useful, it helps supply the first premise for the following argument: (i) there are certain parallels between pragmatic phenomena in natural language (NL) and graphical representation; (ii) formal techniques have been developed for modelling some of the NL phenomena; and thus (iii) once the graphical data are better-understood, we may be able to treat them with formal techniques from NL pragmatics.
منابع مشابه
The Intuitive Basis of Implicature: Relevance Theoretic Implicitness versus Gricean Implying
The notion of implicature was first introduced by Grice (1967, 1989), who defined it essentially as what is communicated less what is said. This definition contributed in part to the proliferation of a large number of different species of implicature by neo-Griceans. Relevance theorists have responded to this by proposing a shift back to the distinction between explicit and implicit meaning (co...
متن کاملPragmatic Inferences Related to Logical Terms
Paul Grice was concerned with the way logical terms such as some, or, and and take on extralogical meanings in conversational contexts. To take one example, Grice (1989) described or as having a weak word meaning identical to formal logic’s inclusive disjunction (which is false only in the case where both disjuncts are) but as conveying in conversation a stronger speaker’s meaning corresponding...
متن کاملProbabilistic integration of linguistic framing in ad-hoc pragmatic implicatures
Language comprehenders make a wide variety of pragmatic inferences to determine the meaning of ambiguous utterances in context. These inferences are affected by both the informativeness of the alternative messages with respect to an interpretation and the relevance of potential interpretations within the context (Grice, 1975). We use simple referential games to explore the interaction of these ...
متن کاملReflections on Jennifer Saul's View of Successful Communication and Conversational Implicature
Saul (2002) criticizes a view on the relationship between speaker meaning and conversational implicatures according to which speaker meaning is exhaustively comprised of what is said and what is implicated. In the course of making her points, she develops a couple of new notions which she calls “utterer-implicature” and “audience-implicature”. She then makes certain claims about the relationshi...
متن کاملRelevance Theory and the saying/implicating distinction
A distinction between saying and implicating has held a central place in pragmatic s since Grice, with ‘what is said’ usually equated with the (context-relative) semantic content of an utterance. In relevance theory, a distinction is made between two kinds of communicated assumptions, explicatures and implicatures, with explicatures defined as pragmatic developments of encoded linguistic meanin...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014